Forty years ago, in August 1981, scientists warned humanity about the threat of global warming on Earth. Its anomalous consequences are becoming more tangible. And yet, there is no effective solution to the problem. In addition, in recent years, information has accumulated about new causes of this dangerous phenomenon, and apocalyptic scenarios for the development of events have appeared.
As you know, news about this problem emerge every day. More and more information is being published. Thus, today it isn’t a big challenge to find reliable data concerning global warming and climate change issues.
Nowadays, the most accurate way to teach students how to learn new information is by writing academic papers. As for John Coleman, he strongly recommends higher education institutions promote climate change argumentative essay writing.
He firmly believes that this task will greatly enhance the awareness of the global disasters among children, youngsters and of course their parents.
By preparing the material, a professional essay writer will inevitably come across such terms as the greenhouse effect, ocean’s overflowing, methane apocalypse, etc.
This will give the students the overall concept of the problem the global ecological community is struggling with.
And hopefully, in the long run, guys who are just writing essays to submit to the teacher one day would come up with new, revolutionary ways of saving our planet.
In the meantime, until young minds did not come to our aid, the powers took up the fight against global warming. In 2016, the Paris Agreement was signed, under which the countries agreed not to raise the average temperature on the planet by more than 1.5 degrees. True, all the Paris agreements, as before the Kyoto Protocol, are of a recommendatory nature.
So, it remains to be hoped that if not the arguments of reason, then at least students’ essays will make humanity seriously think about the threat of global warming and take all the necessary security measures.
And, then The Heartland Institute, a Chicago based think tank, organized an International Conference on Climate Change to give a platform to skeptical scientists from around the world. When I attended the first of these conferences and met these super sharp scientists from M.I.T., Harvard, The University of Virginia, The University of Alabama, UCLA and dozens of other universities, I felt great.
My skeptical position was confirmed over and over again by the research reports they brought to the conference. There was no doubt left in my mind. The global warming/climate change theory had failed and been proven wrong.
Yet, as you know, the climate change frenzy continues. The reason why is clear as a bell: Money. The Federal government is now paying out about 4.5 billion dollars a year in research grants. The science departments and research organizations continue to clamor for the money. And it is only granted to those who support the climate change position. And, mostly because Al Gore was a powerful force in the Democrat Party for many years, the issue has also become part of that party’s platform. Politics and money; what a power combination. We skeptics have our hands full.
I have produced videos debunking climate change and posted them on You Tube. I write the essays, such as this one, and post them on my little website. I make speeches where ever and whenever I am invited. Hundreds of others do the same. Heartland continues to sponsor International Conference every year or two. But try as we do, our efforts are small compared to the 4.5 billion dollars, the Democrat Party and the media. It is David against Goliath.
“So Mr. Coleman, please explain to me how it is that you know for certain that this theory has failed. And even if there is some question about whether the theory is correct or not, isn’t it taking a big chance to not cut back on greenhouse gasses? Shouldn’t we do it, just in case? Why don’t we cut back on carbon dioxide emissions as sort of an insurance policy, just in case they are right and you are wrong.” Whenever I speak before college student groups about the climate change issue, the above is the essence of the first question I am usually asked and it is usually cheered.
I understand that after decades of media coverage of global warming and its successor climate change and constant lecturing about it and the showing of the Al Gore Documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” over and over again in schools, that there is plenty of discomfort about the debunking of climate change by skeptics such as me. Our detractors often toss us in with the advocates of a flat Earth, chem-trails, flying saucer ET story tellers and those who think the NASA Moon landing was all made up. All I can ask is that you try to think about this essay with an open mind, then do what additional checking you are motivated to do. I am certain that if you are open minded you will realize that based on everything we know right now there is no significant man-made climate change now and no reason to expect any in the future. Once you take that position, please join us in trying to change public opinion and government policies.
And please understand that cutting emissions “just in case as a sort of insurance policy” is not a good idea, either. For the next generation of youngsters, that could be a horribly expensive insurance policy. Our government’s global warming actions are already costing the average American family of four about $1,400 a year in increased costs for food and energy and taxes. For those kids that can mean less health care or healthy food, no internet connection or no computer. Or it might come out of their college funds. And the added cost of food and energy for those in the third world nations could actually lead to the death for untold millions. I don’t think we should “buy the insurance”.
Despite this issue, please never lose sight of this: The most important thing you will ever learn is to love and be loved in return.